Hi Roberto,
Wow, what a comprehensive reference! Thanks a lot for that and even though I still haven't parsed everything it gave me a high level overview of the scope.
On 2.05.2023 11:47, Roberto Sassu wrote:
Ok. Maybe this would have less priority. The first priority would be just reuse Sequoia PGP possibly untouched.
Yep, I agree. Even though you sent some really impressive code fragments my C is a little bit rusty (hehe) and it would take me quite a bit of time to write bindings to all these structs.
If you would be working on that part I'd be happy to fill in any "Sequoia-specific" parts in your Rust code including parsing MPIs and verifying signatures [0].
Thank you for your time!
Kind regards, Wiktor
[0]: https://docs.sequoia-pgp.org/sequoia_guide/chapter_01/index.html